The political honeymoon period of
BJP got over earlier than it would have expected and the marital discords that
a political party faces after coming to power have started even
sooner than it might ha
ve anticipated.
The historic mandate it received
in the general elections last year, as a majority of us will agree, was made
possible because of Narendra Modi. Modi the individual was the reason that
people voted for BJP rather than the other way around.
So if the public perception is
that the ‘Ache din’ have come then one has to attribute it to Modi and if the
perception is that there is no change from the days of the UPA then the
responsibility for that also squarely lies on the shoulder of Modi.
History is made every day, to be
presented years in the future after it is created. Ten-fifteen years from now, pages of history will tell us that whatever happened to
this country, the good or the bad as it will turn out, was because of Modi. No
one will remember the finance minister, the defence minister, the external
affairs ministers or the various BJP spokespersons.
In light of these ground rules,
that one can tend to disagree with, the inaction on the part of Modi to take
‘notice’ of the act done by Sushma Swaraj and Rajasthan chief minister
Vasundhara Raje, is surprising. More so because in case of Modi, unlike his
predecessor, his act of taking notice of something is very much visible and
more often than not, it makes news. In this case, it his inaction that is
grabbing the headlines.
The BJP can field their best spokespersons
to counter the allegations but can the truth that Swawraj was dealing with a
fugitive be changed? Can the fact that her daughter and her husband were
dealing with him change? Can it be safely said that the external affairs
minister of the country, one of the top four ministers of the country , was
unaware of the legal status of Lalit Modi? That he was ‘wanted’? Are
‘humanitarian grounds’ a sound excuse to help a fugitive , that too
without keeping others in the loop? And was ‘different shades of blue’ supposed to be a funny?
Similarly, no one, even Vasundhara Raje, will
not and has not denied that Lalit Modi was a close friend of hers. People make
friends, who later turn into acquaintances and foes and that is perfectly okay.
However how can Raje, in her position as the leader of opposition in the
Rajasthan assembly, do something that she knew was illegal? In her case, it is
evident that she knew that what she was doing was wrong and that is why she
asked for a disclaimer that the action taken by her in support of Lalit Modi
should not come out in open.
How will she defend the fact that
the shares of her son’s company were bought by Lalit Modi at Rs 11 crore? She
cannot.
Inevitably, Narendra Modi in times to come, will face many
more such instances of impropriety from his cabinet colleagues, his party
colleagues and his friends. For him, the easy way of coming out from such situation
will be to close his eye and move ahead till the story dies down and is
forgotten from the memory of the people and this is what the Congress led UPA
did. And that is what the BJP is hoping will happen in the case of Swaraj and
Raje.
The not so easier route for
Narendra Modi is to act on these acts of impropriety.
The people of this country have
for long lived in an era where things were said but not executed. So much so
that the political promises and commitments are no longer taken seriously, let
alone give rise to any hope. When Narendra Modi, during his political campaign,
stated that there will be no corruption in his government, not many believed
that but when he said that he will take action, quick and strict, against
anyone found to be indulging in corruption, everyone believed it.
The time to put those words of promises into action has come. And with every passing day of the promises being reneged, the hopes and expectations of those who reposed faith in him will decrease, slowly,gradually but surely.
There have been many Prime
Ministers before Modi and there will numerous after him. The path to creating a
legacy and securing a name in the pages of history, as each of us wants, is
well defined but whether we are willing to walk on that path is something that
only we have to decide.
.